The Agenda

There are two public texts that clearly spell out the agenda of the globalists. The first is the Bush Doctrine or better known as the "The National Security Strategy for the United States of America". It speaks about the world in the post cold war era and the role that the US must take.

"We will disrupt and destroy terrorist organizations by defending the United States, the American people, and our interests at home and abroad by identifying and destroying the threat before it reaches our borders…we will not hesitate to act alone, if necessary, to exercise our right of self-defense by acting preemptively against such terrorists, to prevent them from doing harm against our people and our country."

So the United States is prepared to launch a first strike attack against presumed enemies with or without world support. The US will dominate the world for the reason of defending our interests against the evil-doers. Is there another reason?

The second text is from the 1997 book, "The Grand Chessboard - American Primacy and its Geostrategic Imperatives," by the globalist think tank member, Zbigniew Brzezinski - (Council on Foreign Relations, the Bilderburgs, and the Trilateral Commission). Author Michael Ruppert suggests Brzezinski is the most powerful man in the world. With this in mind I take Brzezinski seriously. Excerpts from his book clearly state the role the United States must play in the world at this time and why.

"World domination by the United States will lead to nation states being incorporated into a new world order, controlled solely by economic interests as dictated by banks, corporations and ruling elites concerned with the maintenance (by manipulation and war) of their power."

"…the three grand imperatives of imperial geostrategy are to prevent collusion and maintain security dependence among the vassals, to keep tributaries pliant and protected, and to keep the barbarians from coming together." (p.40)

"America's withdrawal from the world or because of the sudden emergence of a successful rival - would produce massive international instability. It would prompt global anarchy." (p. 30)

To put this into plain English, the think tanks have reasoned, planned, and explained to the world that one country (the US) must rule the world to keep it from falling into chaos or in the words of Brzezinski - global anarchy. Justified imperialism as a means to maintain security is not a correct objective. If the US really wants to stabilize the world I say drop butter not bombs, enlist the naturopaths not soldiers. Think of how secure the world would be if our soldiers were naturalist doctors learning as much from the shamans as they were giving. What do you think? Is this the way to guarantee the future of life on this planet? Will we all become consuming robotoms acting on instincts governed by the global elites? Or shall we nurture life on the planet and share our great abundance with the rest of the world and end the hoarding posture that is making the US a target of terrorism?

I look out at the stars and I wonder, are we the most advanced life in the universe, or are we the only life in the universe? Is Earth it? IF this is so, then who are we to entertain thoughts of destroying it, who are we as human beings to let life be placed on the endangered species list? Who are we to not defend life when it is attacked? Attacking life is exactly what the society think tanks that rule the world are doing by promoting a false war on terrorist bogeymen around the globe; by proposing that the US dominate the world to save it from anarchy.

The current Central Asian war is not a response to terrorism, nor is it a reaction to Islamic fundamentalism. It is in fact, the beginning of a final conflict before total world domination by the elites and their New World Order. The opinion of Dr.Johannes Bruno Koeppl, NATO advisor adds clarity and reason.

"The interests behind the Bush Administration have prepared for and are now moving to implement open world dictatorship within the next five years. They are not fighting against terrorists. They are fighting against citizens."

He goes on to give this warning to the world.

"The arriving New World Order is a global economics system created and legislated to benefit the few at the expense of the masses. The shadowy people who are imposing this upon each of us do not want us to know about it until it is over, and thus too late to change." Survive: Dr. Koeppl suggests starting a school to offer statesmanship training for our elected officials, in order to insure that their loyalties lie with the nation they serve and not with the money powers.

REMEMBER WATERGATE!

The best way to change leaders is for the people to loose faith in them. Are they taking us in the direction the people want to go? Will the people loose trust in their message when they know where they are headed? Are there smoking guns in the 911 tragedy that are waiting to be discovered that will make the Watergate scandal seem like a prelude? The reason why Watergate took down the president and his cabinet was that there was a large amount of mistrust in the president, is this the case today?

Another reason for the 911 tragedy may be that it serves the globalist's agenda to supplant the rights of the people with fear from an outside threat. Americans are begging for more security, more inspections, more military police. YIKES! Again from the 1997 book, "The Grand Chessboard" by Zbigniew Brzezinski - founder of the Trilateral Commission and a member of several other globalist think tanks:

"As America becomes an increasingly multicultural society, it may become more difficult to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues, except in the circumstance of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat."

Is the War on Tourism, I mean Terrorism the external threat that Brzezinski speaks of? This is not conspiracy. I use their words to illustrate quite bluntly the plan that our rulers have for our lives and our world. Kissinger - 1991

"Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond whether real or promulgated that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government."

Dr. Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger Conference, Evians, France, 1991 This is from Kissinger, the messenger from the rulers of our world speaking at their conference when they talk among themselves about instituting their World Government. His message also addresses the need for an outside threat to unite the will of the people to accept their plan. Is the propaganda of the War on Terrorism giving reason for the execution of the planned external threat? This discussion could write another book. But more importantly we must remember that there is propaganda at work to divide the people with the fear of an external threat. The bigger question to ask is, who is behind the external threat?

"Why of course the people don't want war. . . . That is understood. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country."
-Hermann Goering, Nazi officer, during his Nuremberg war crimes trial

And all the Whos in Whoville became afraid of their own shadows!

###