Bush | Bush Family | Bushisms | Rummisms | The Bush Doctrine | The Secret Government | Fascism

---

Middle East | Saddam Statue | Protests | Globalization Home

 

Whose Civil War In Iraq?
By Michael Tivana, June 2005

Support for the Iaqi peoples' solidarity is the next step toward a real peace.

This is referring to the story below -
"LA Times can't bring itself to recognize that civil war has arrived in Iraq"

The establishment has the goal of reorganizing the middle east into new countries, on their way to fulfilling their dream of a World Government. It will take a lot of instability to do this so a civil war is what they want. In fact a civil war in Syria and Iran and Somalia, and Sudan etc. would be a dream come true for these people. It is the Modus Operandi of the CIA since its inception, to create chaos then step in as the peacemaker and implement their new government that promises security. Now the CIA has the legal authority to carry out assassinations in their plans to create order from chaos and they are taking advantage and getting kudos. Of course they are creating a civil war - they are arming Iraqis (Iraqi Army) and giving them medals for killing their fellow countrymen, that would be a civil war.

Here is what Henry Kissinger said in a speech in 1991 at a Bilderberg Conference -

"Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order, tomorrow they will be grateful. This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat … whether real or not that threatened our very existence...when presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government."

I subscribe to the fact that hundreds of thousands of Shiites and Sunnis have and continue to march together in solidarity against the US occupiers, not against one another. To call this a civil war is only doing the bidding of the establishment's goal to create more chaos. Please side with the people of Iraq in promoting their solidarity, not a civil war.

In Solidarity,
Tivana

'LA Times' can't bring itself to recognize that civil war has arrived in Iraq

The 'Los Angeles Times' has shown itself more willing than the 'New York Times' and the 'Washington Post' to entertain the possibility that what is really occurring in Iraq is the beginning of a civil war. -- A May 16 article by Ashraf Khalil and Patrick J. McDonnell used the euphemism "wholesale retribution," but clearly described a burgeoning civil war.

http://www.ufppc.org/content/view/2793/

But no major U.S. media organ has yet recognized the obvious fact that civil war has arrived in Iraq, and in this front-page article published Sunday, the 'Times' maintains the standard U.S. media line: there are "strains" that "could ignite a conflict," "many wonder" whether this is "a prelude to civil war," some are "seeking a civil war," people "concede" there are "divisions" in Iraq, etc.

http://www.ufppc.org/content/view/2866/